Unbeknownst to Lillian, on April 15th at the U.S. Consulate in Callao, Peru, Minister Christiancy signed a bill of divorce, witnessed by the then U.S. Consul, R.T. Clayton.Nearly a month later (May 13th), the Washington Post reported that the "long-threatened" divorce suit had been filed a day earlier in Equity Court, but it wasn't until May 28th that details were published:
HIS SUIT: Christiancy claimed he had been faithful as a husband and executed his duties; that no "live" child had issued from marriage. That on or about December 25th, 1879, Mrs. Christiancy had committed adultery at the DC-based St. James Hotel with a Mr. Edelberto Giro, according to the name he had signed on the hotel register--all this without the Senator’s knowledge or consent.
He also charged that both before and after she left him in Peru the previous November, Lillian had committed adultery with various other person on various other occasions.
HER COUNTER BILL:
About the only part of Mr. Christiancy's bill of suit that was truthful, answered Lillian, were the basic facts of their date of marriage and separate residences. No, she said, her husband did not keep his wedding vows or execute his duties and obligations as a husband, as he’d vowed.
As a matter of fact, she said she suffered from constant pain because of her husband's "wilfull neglect" in failing to provide adequate medical care during an "illness" which "prevented any issue from the marriage being born alive." Furthermore, she denied having cheated with Edel Giro at St. James Hotel -- or with anyone else.
Lillian claimed she had been forced to leave Peru because she feared for her life. She said though her husband was now earning $10,000 a year and owned valuable property in Michigan, he had not given her any financial support.
Her statement detailed his alleged abuse: In March of 1877, while in Lansing, he struck her and she fell on the floor--and that her own mother had witnessed the event.
In August of 1878, Lillian said that her doctor had ordered her to take a trip to Healing Springs in Bath County, Virginia (the present-day Homestead Resort). There, she claimed that her husband had conspired to put her in " a false and suspicious position" with one or more male guests at the spa.
On the 28th or 29th of December, 1878, said Lillian, Isaac hit her against a door and threatened that if she ever tried to leave her, he would bribe witnesses to impugn her character.
Finally, Lillian charged that in Peru during late September of 1879, while under influence of opium and liquor, her husband threatened to kill her, saying "If I had a revolver, I’d blow your brains out right now." He then choked her so hard that his hands left impressions on her throat. She ran out of their house and stayed in the yard until someone could accompany her into the house. That night, she was forced to stay in a hotel.
The next day, her husband apologized so fiercely that she decided to return to the Legation house. But the next morning, he came to her bedside and abused [read: raped] her in a "most shameful and indecent manner," bruising her arms, and she was consequently suffering from a great pain in her side. Again, a month later, he attacked her, using vile language. Lillian claimed she ran to the sitting room. He followed and tried to choke her. She screamed, and "someone" came in and escorted her from the house.
She also stated that Christiancy had failed to get her medical attention during the separate premature deliveries of two babies. As a result, she was permanently injured.
In her cross suit, Lillian was not only asking for divorce, but also alimony. A motion was filed about giving her an allowance and paying for her legal feels and would be heard the following Tuesday in court.
Christiancy's attorney, E. Chase Ingersoll, did not contest this request, but stipulated that his client was only willing to support her in the manner in which she had been living before they met.
Lillian's attorney, John Oliver, said no, that Lillian was entitled to live according to her husband's standard of living.
Finally, the Post reported that Mr. Christiancy was considering filing an additional bill outlining further infidelities on the part of his wife, which the Senator had kindly dropped from the original bill, wanting to spare her embarrassment. His attorney suggested that if the plaintiff were to name names, these would be considered particeps criminis—that is, accomplices to a crime.
©Cecily Hilleary, 2009.




